What if change is the illusion, and true reality is something eternal, immobile, perfect? This is the provocation of Parmenides of Elea, Heraclitus's greatest intellectual opponent in Antiquity.
Parmenides' thesis
Parmenides lived in southern Italy, in a Greek colony called Eleia, and left fragments of a long philosophical poem, On Nature. The central thesis is radical: Being is, Non-Being is not, and change would imply something passing from being to non-being, which is logically impossible. Therefore, change does not exist. What exists is Being, one, eternal, indivisible, immobile, equal to itself at all points. What the senses perceive as change is illusion, the "path of opinion", the path of mortals who allow themselves to be deceived by the appearance of things. The truth, the "path of truth", is only accessible through pure reason.
The weight of Parmenides in Western philosophy
The phrase that sums it all up is short and uncompromising: "Being is, and Non-Being is not." Four words that would influence Plato, and through him, all of medieval Christian theology. Plato inherits from Parmenides the idea that true knowledge is always immutable, which is why the Platonic Forms (the Form of Good, the Form of Beauty, the Form of Justice) are eternal, perfect, outside of time. Without Parmenides, there is no Plato. Without Plato, Western philosophy would be unrecognizable.
What does Parmenides represent to you?
Parmenides gives voice to one of the most difficult feelings to articulate: the refusal to accept certain losses. When someone we love dies, there is a moment when the world doesn't seem to have the right to keep spinning. This is Parmenides, the insistence that Being cannot simply become Non-Being. It is the search for the eternal, and this search is not escape, it is the deepest demand of the human being, even if Heraclitus respond to her completely differently.
Readings from Nous
Read the classics in depth
Our list of more than 130 recommended books, commented and organized by theme, so you don't read in the dark.
See recommended readingsFrequently asked questions
What is the difference between Heraclitus and Parmenides?
Heraclitus argues that everything flows, that change is the rule of the universe, ordered by the Logos. Parmenides defends the opposite: change is illusion, and what is real, Being, is eternal, immobile and indivisible.
Why does Parmenides say change is impossible?
Because, for him, change means that something passes from being to non-being, which is logically impossible: Being is, Non-Being is not. What the senses perceive as change would be just an illusion, the "way of opinion".
Which philosopher has most influenced the Western tradition?
Parmenides, through Plato. Plato inherits the idea that true knowledge is always immutable, which is why Platonic Forms are eternal. Without Parmenides, there is no Plato; Without Plato, Western philosophy would be unrecognizable.
Continue: Heraclitus: No One Enters the Same River Twice · What is Panta Rhei · Act and Potency, in Aristotle
Home class (Community NousCast): O pensamento de Heráclito está em tudo ao seu redor