Every people, at every time, has looked at the sky and been amazed. Have you ever asked why rain falls, why people die, where everything that exists comes from? Astonishment at the world is not a Greek privilege, nor a privilege anywhere. So why do we say that philosophy was born there, on that coast, and not in any other people who were also astonished?
The answer isn't in astonishment. It's in what was done with it.
What Plato and Aristotle said about amazement
Plato and Aristotle, writing centuries after the birth of philosophy, looked back and tried to name what started it. The two arrived at the same word: thaumazein (θαυμάζειν), to marvel, to be astonished, to be perplexed.
Plato, in Theaetetus, 155d, says that this pathos, astonishment, is characteristic of the philosopher, and that philosophy has no other origin. Aristotle repeats the idea in Metaphysics, I, 2, 982b: it was out of amazement that men began to philosophize, both now and in the beginning.
Notice that the two agree on something that seems simple and is not: philosophy does not begin with a conclusion, it begins with perplexity. Someone looks at what always seemed obvious, the sun rising, the water turning to ice, death arriving, and stops finding it obvious.
So far, however, this still does not distinguish a philosopher from any curious person. And it is exactly at this point that most explanations stop, satisfied with the definition, when what matters is one step ahead.
The difference between curiosity and investigation
The difference that separates the curious person from the philosopher is not one of talent. It's discipline.
Curiosity is a reaction. It lights up when faced with something strange and fades soon after, jumping from subject to subject, and is satisfied with the first answer that sounds good. We all have curiosity, and it alone does not support anything: not a thesis, not a method, not a tradition of thought that spans centuries.
Investigation is another thing. This is what happens when astonishment is subjected to method. You formulate the question in a way that it can be answered wrong, that is, in a way that admits refutation. You say what your answer depends on, what conditions support it. And you accept, in advance, that someone else might bring it down with a better reason.
The birth of philosophy is not the birth of astonishment. All people were astonished. It is the birth of astonishment that refuses to settle.
This sentence carries the entire argument. Being surprised is easy and it is human. The difficult thing, and what ancient Greece first did systematically, is to refuse to stop at the first satisfactory explanation, and to insist on asking again, and again, until the answer stands up to someone else's examination.
The questions that disciplined amazement opened
When amazement organizes itself into investigation, he starts asking questions that have not grown old. Some of them are still ours.
One: What is everything made of? It is the question about the ultimate origin of things, the root of what we today call physics and metaphysics.
Another: is there an order behind this? In other words, the world is chaos, or it has a structure, an intelligibility that the human mind can follow.
Yet another: how do I know this is true? The question that examines the instrument of knowledge itself, and which would one day be called theory of knowledge.
And the one that seems the simplest, and is the one that no one finishes answering: how should one live?
Notice what these four questions have in common. None of them respond to authority. None of them close because someone in a higher position decided to do so. They all admit that you disagree and give your reason. They were born, from the beginning, with the door open for examination.
Why does it still matter
If philosophy were just astonishment, it would have been born anywhere, at any time, because astonishment is universal. What made it happen right there was a much rarer habit: the refusal to settle. The refusal to treat the first good answer as the final answer.
It is this habit, more than any specific answer, that lives on in all serious inquiry, within and outside philosophy. And it is this habit, too, that separates those who consume an explanation from those who examine it.
The channel's complete lesson covers how this disciplined astonishment was born in a specific square, with a specific alphabet, and why it had nothing to do with Athenian democracy, contrary to what is often repeated.
Readings from Nous
Read the classics in depth
Our list of more than 230 recommended books, commented and organized by theme, so you don't read in the dark.
See recommended readingsFrequently asked questions
What does thaumazein mean?
Thaumazein (θαυμάζειν) is the Greek verb for to be amazed, to be amazed, to be perplexed by something. Plato, in Theaetetus, 155d, calls this pathos peculiar to the philosopher, and says that philosophy has no other origin. Aristotle repeats the idea in Metaphysics, I, 2, 982b: it was out of amazement that men began to philosophize, both now and in the beginning.
What is the difference between curiosity and philosophical astonishment?
It's a difference in discipline, not talent. Curiosity is a reaction: it turns on and off, skips the subject and is satisfied with the first answer that sounds good. Investigation is astonishment subjected to method, when someone formulates the question in a way that it can be answered wrong, says what the answer depends on, and accepts in advance that someone else can overturn it.
Why didn't all people who were astonished create philosophy?
Because astonishment alone is not enough. Every people, in every era, was amazed at the sky, at death, at the origin of things. What was born in Greece was not astonishment, it was the astonishment that was not satisfied with the first answer, and that was organized into questions that could be challenged by another without it being offended.
Continue into the cluster: Is doubting what I was taught a lack of faith? · Philosophy was not born of democracy · Paideia: training is not instruction · The lion episode in Don Quixote
Source class (YouTube): O Nascimento da Pergunta na Grécia (NousCast)