Apeiron is the principle proposed by Anaximander, disciple of Thales, to answer the question for Arché: an unlimited, indeterminate principle, without defined qualities. The Greek word ápeiron (ἄπειρον) literally means "without limit", from a- (without) and péras (πέρας, limit).
Why Anaximander disagreed with his own master
Here something rare happens in the history of thought: the student disagrees with the master, and does so with an argument, not with rebellion. Anaximander reasoned like this: if the beginning of everything were water, which is cold and wet, it could never generate its opposite, fire, which is hot and dry. Over time, one of the elements would end up devouring the others, and the world would be just water, which is evidently not the case. Therefore, he concluded, Arché cannot be any of the particular things we know, water, fire, earth or air. It needs to be something without defined qualities, without borders, indeterminate: the ápeiron.
A principle that no one has ever seen
Notice the jump in relation to Tales. Thales pointed to something you can see, water. Anaximander even reasoned something that no one had ever seen, because the very logic of the argument demanded that it exist. This is why Apeiron is considered the first truly abstract concept in the West: it does not describe an observable substance, it describes a requirement of reason. A single sentence remained from him, of strange beauty, almost court-like: "Where things are born, there they also perish, according to necessity; for they pay each other the penalty and retribution for injustice, according to the order of time" (Anaximander, only fragment, apud Simplicius, Physics, 24.13).
What Apeiron teaches about the philosophical method
The episode matters less for the content of the response and more for what it reveals about the method that was being born: an explanation could, and should, be corrected by a better one, as long as the correction was accompanied by reason, not authority. Anaximander did not beat Thales because he was a master or because he shouted louder, he won because he pointed out a logical inconsistency in the previous answer. This same gesture would be repeated with the next disciple, Anaximenes, closing the cycle of three generations that founded the habit of examining every answer through reason.
Readings from Nous
Read the classics in depth
Our list of more than 130 recommended books, commented and organized by theme, so you don't read in the dark.
See recommended readingsFrequently asked questions
What is Anaximander's Apeiron?
The unlimited and indeterminate principle, without defined qualities, which Anaximander proposed as Arché of all things. The Greek word ápeiron (ἄπειρον) means "without limit", from a-, without, and péras, limit.
Why did Anaximander reject Thales' water as the principle of everything?
Because, water being cold and moist, it could never generate its opposite, fire, hot and dry. A particular element would end up devouring the others over time, and the world would be just water. Therefore the principle could not be any particular thing.
Why is Apeiron considered the first abstract concept in the West?
Because Anaximander didn't point to something you could see, like water. He reasoned to a formless, limitless principle that no one had ever observed, and whose existence the logic of the argument itself demanded.
Continue: Who was Thales of Miletus? · Anaximenes and air rarefaction · Why the disciple must refute the master · Macbeth and Raskolnikov: the anatomy of guilt
Source class (NousCast Community): Quem foram os Pré-Socráticos? O momento em que o mundo deixou de ser explicado por deuses