"I know that I know nothing" is probably the most repeated line ever attributed to a philosopher. It shows up in photo captions, in motivational quotes, in any ready-made list of ancient wisdom, and it catches on for a simple reason: it sounds like the frankest confession anyone has ever made. The detail is that this exact phrase, in these exact words, is not in any text that survives from Socrates. And what he actually said, in the Apology, is more precise, and useful for far more than the version that circulates out there.
Why this line caught on
There is a reason "I know that I know nothing" has crossed twenty-four centuries: it resolves, in a handful of words, a tension anyone feels near someone who knows a great deal. It puts the most remembered man in the history of philosophy on the same ground as someone still learning, and that sounds like genuine humility, the opposite of the arrogance expected from a sage. It is short, it is quotable, and it carries the prestige of his name. It makes sense that this version won the fight for space in collective memory, even without being exactly what he said.
What the Apology actually says
The account closest to Socrates' trial is the Apology of Socrates, written by Plato, who was in the audience at that very court. It is there, in the passage known as 21d, that he explains what he discovered after going through Athens questioning politicians, poets, and craftsmen, looking for someone wiser than himself to hand back the title the oracle of Delphi had given him. In the reference edition Nous uses to quote Plato, "As Grandes Obras de Platão" (Mimética, 2019, translated by Carlos Alberto Nunes), the core of that passage is this: what he does not know, he also does not think he knows.
Feel the difference between the two phrases, because it is the axis of every correct reading of Socrates. "I know nothing" is a total confession, and being total it is also useless, because someone who knows absolutely nothing has no place to start investigating anything. What Socrates says is narrower, and that is exactly why it works: he does not add, to what he does not know, the assumption that he does know it after all.
The account he settles better
He keeps a better account than the others, not because he knows more, but because he does not add to his own ledger a credit he does not have. It is exactly that small surplus, the ignorance that believes itself knowledge, that becomes the one obstacle that studying alone cannot fix. Someone already convinced that they know will not go looking, and that is why the real risk was never ignorance. It was being ignorant without knowing it.
Why the real version is useful for more
"I know nothing" is a phrase you admire and keep. "What I do not know, I do not think I know either" is a phrase you use: it asks you to separate, inside what you carry as certainty, what you have actually examined from what you merely inherited and never checked. It is a working criterion, not praise for your own modesty, and it is far harder to apply than to repeat, because it demands going slowly over exactly the convictions you never stopped to check.
What stays with you
The popular version of Socrates makes for a nice phrase to keep. The real version makes for a method, the same one behind maieutics and the questions that assert nothing, only investigate. That is the thread running through the Nous class on Socrates, starting from the day an oracle answered a question that nobody should have asked.
Readings from Nous
Read the classics in depth
Our list of more than 230 recommended books, commented and organized by theme, so you don't read in the dark.
See recommended readingsFrequently asked questions
Did Socrates really say "I know that I know nothing"?
Not in those words. The phrase circulates as a popular summary, but it is not in the Apology of Socrates nor in any other text that survives from him. What the text says, in 21d, is more precise: "what I do not know, I do not think I know either."
What did Socrates actually say, then, in the Apology?
In passage 21d, he explains that he does not add, to what he does not know, the assumption that he does know it. In other words, he does not claim to know nothing, he simply refuses to assume he knows what he does not know. It is a phrase of method, not of despair.
Why is the real version better than the popular phrase?
Because "I know nothing" is a total confession and, for that reason, useless: someone who knows absolutely nothing has no place to start from. The real phrase points to the right risk, which is not ignorance, but being ignorant without knowing it, the one type of ignorance that studying alone cannot fix.
Continue: Know thyself: the Socratic method · Socratic questions: the method, not the list · Apology of Socrates: the unexamined life · Palazzo Barberini and Caravaggio
Source class: Sócrates e o conhece-te a ti mesmo: autoconhecimento, virtude e maiêutica